Comparative Study of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis Methods in Environmental Sustainability

نویسندگان

چکیده

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is an operations research framework used to support decision-makers in choosing alternatives characterized by multiple conflicting criteria. Over the past years, several MCDA methods have been developed and a significant drawback of using more than one algorithm for given problem potential ranking that they may yield. This work aims at setting first steps toward systematic reconciles different rankings from returns decision maker unique solution. The proposed method contextualised within existing scientific literature illustrated considering four case studies select environmentally sustainable solutions. Results show agreed reliable obtained method.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparative Study of Different Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods

Now –adays the multi-criteria decision making methods are gaining importance for selection of best suited alternative among the available alternatives. Decision makers in the construction industry frequently face the problem of assessing a wide range of alternative options, and selecting one based on a set of conflicting criteria. MCDM methods are based on aggregating function representing “ cl...

متن کامل

How can Multi-criteria Decision Analysis contribute to environmental policy making? A case study on macro-sustainability in Germany

When it comes to decision making in the field of environmental policy, there is still a lack of useful decision aid methods. This paper intends to show how multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) as an useful decision aid method could help to reduce inefficiencies in macro-related environmentaleconomic-social decision making. MCDA methods differ from conventional methods as they are taking into...

متن کامل

Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Seismic Structural Retrofitting

The selection of a strategy to seismically upgrade an existing building is a difficult problem. In fact, several different technologies are available to this aim nowadays. Furthermore, many generally conflicting options have to be considered to assess the performance of each alternative. Decision support systems like the socalled multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods may be useful in ma...

متن کامل

An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods

 Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods have evolved to accommodate various types of applications. Dozens of methods have been developed, with even small variations to existing methods causing the creation of new branches of research. This paper performs a literature review of common Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods, examines the advantages and disadvantages of the identified meth...

متن کامل

Risk management in urban tunnels using methods of game theory and multi-criteria decision-making

In general, underground spaces are associated with high risks because of their high uncertainty in geotechnical environments. Since most accidents and incidents in these structures are often associated with uncertainty, the development of risk analysis and management methods and prevention of accidents are essential. A deeper recognition of the factors affecting the implementation process can p...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2190-3026', '2190-3018']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9205-6_21